Anti IRS
Bill Conklin Blog
 
IRS HelpOffer in CompromiseBill Conklin BlogRemove Wage LevyCourt Cases V. IRSFight The IRSAnti-IRS NewslettersFraud AlertDefense against CriticsContact Anti-IRSCritical IRS Updates

Would you like to make a donation?

I have established this blog to keep you informed about the latest anti-IRS news as it becomes available to me. Check back often as you continue to do your IRS research through the critical updates page and through this blog page. Thanks for your support.

Bill Conklin
3296 Raleigh St.
Denver, Colorado 80212
By Phone: (303) 455-0837
By Fax: (303) 480-1799
E-Mail

ATTENTION
To read archived blogs, scroll down to the bottom of the page and click the dated links.

For more IRS information, please visit my other site, Remove Wage Levy by clicking here.

Archive Newer | Older

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Tax Protestor Cases

Tax Protester Cases


      The courts have been increasingly unfriendly toward the exempt W-4 and the refusal to pay taxes. However, individuals who send reasonable letters to the IRS and who do not file exempt W-4 Forms will fare much better. The moral of the story is: don't file an exempt W-4.  The district court imposed the fraud penalty against an individual who specifically told the IRS that he was refusing to pay taxes.   The court agreed that mere not filing or nonpayment that is disclosed by a taxpayer to the IRS does not justify the fraud penalty.  But the taxpayer filed exempt W-4 forms and then informed the IRS that he was refusing to pay taxes.  The court imposed the fraud penalty.  See Zell, 763 F2d 1139, 85-2 USTC 9698, 56 AFTR2d 85-5128 (10th Cir. 1985).  Another individual sent various communications to the IRS informing them that he did not intend to participate in the income tax system but the IRS did not come up with any evidence to show fraud so the court ruled in favor of the individual.  See Raley, 676 F2d 980, 49 AFTR 82-122 (3rd Circuit.

3:53 pm mst 

Monday, November 2, 2009

Cross Examination and the Tax Trial

CROSS EXAMINATION AND THE TAX TRIAL

 

            The Sixth Amendment gives the criminal defendant the right "to be confronted with the witnesses against him." This right includes the right to cross-examine the government witnesses in a criminal trial. (In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257 and Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400.

 

            During cross-examination, you may ask questions about the following two areas:

 

            1.  The subject matter of the witness' direct testimony.

            2.  The credibility of the witness.

 

            You have the right on cross-examination to try to impeach the credibility of the witness.  You can ask questions regarding prior convictions, the witness' personal interest in the case, bias or hostility, prior inconsistent statements, or a lack of capacity to understand.

 

            Leading questions are allowed on cross-examination.  As a matter of fact they are very important on cross- examination.  The selected fact should be stated and words such as "right," "true," and "were you not," should be added at the end of the question.  An example of a leading question would be the following:

 

1.  And you were in the room at  6:00 pm, right?

 2.  You were twenty feet away from the victim when he was shot, were you not?

 

            Remember that you do not have to cross-examine a witness.  Be sure that if you do cross-examine, you understand the purpose of the cross-examination.  The jurors have been conditioned by the media and they will expect a cross-examination so if you don't cross-examine it is possible that the jury may believe a witness who is not cross-examined because he has testified under oath or because they may believe that the opposing attorney believes the testimony to be accurate.

 

            A main thrust of cross examination is to ferret out the testimony that is favorable to your case and augment that testimony.

 

            For example:

 

     Q.  Mr. Smith, you testified that the Transaction Code of 150 on Mr. Jones' Master File means that a return was filed for that year, did you not?

 

            If some of the testimony of the witness has been adverse, then it is the purpose of the cross-examination to minimize its effect.  You can do this by emphasizing the defects in the witness' overall knowledge; the defects in the witness' conduct and the immateriality of the opposition testimony.

 

            The jury is generally very attentive as the cross- examination begins.  You have a good chance to make a lasting impression with the first question.  So ask a question that you can win!

 

            It is important to maintain control of the witness during the cross-examination.  Keep your questions brief, simple and clear. Also remember that the use of leading questions is the most important way of maintaining control.

 

            Questions like the following may be used by the government attorney against the patriot?

 

Q.  You filed a tax return in 1973, didn't you?

 Q.  You did not speak with an attorney before you quit filing returns, did you?

 

            Remember that you can style your questions against the government witnesses the same way.  You can maintain control of their testimony through the use of the leading question.

 

            Sometimes the witness will respond in a non-responsive way.  You must be aware of this problem or you may lose control of the witness.  Answers using the following words are non-responsive: May, might, possibly, usually normally, but, I guess so, etc.

 

            If the witness is non-responsive, you may want to demand a responsive answer or ask the judge to direct the witness to answer the question.  Good luck, practice makes perfect, so get your practice first in civil litigation.

 

 

12:23 pm mst 


Archive Newer | Older

BillConklin.jpg

Bill Conklin: 30 years of Experience in IRS Procedures
Removing Wage Levies
Waging Court Battles
Publishing Books
Providing Answers
303-455-0837

CALL BILL FIRST, YOU WILL BE GLAD YOU DID
Bill Conklin wrote Why No One is Required to File Tax Returns